Wait... Jake: Are you a libertarian? Maybe it can be a tie...
Wait... Jake: Are you a libertarian? Maybe it can be a tie...
Video #1: My response to Tia D.
The deal is you have to make a video response sharing 5 things about yourself. I s'ppose ideally you'll also tag other people to make response videos of their own, but I don't really know that many folks on YouTube likely to make a response video to one of mine so I guess you can consider this me tagging you if you like.
If you have a WordPress blog you're probably familiar with the Blog Stats tracking features. If you're not yet familiar with them then you should be because they're awesome. One of the things WP allows you to track are what search terms people plug into Google that bring them to your blog.
I decided I wanted to make a Wordle image of the search terms that bring people to my blog so I've been pasting them into an Excel document so I can more easily alphabetize them and see just how frequently some of them come up because some of them reappear a LOT.
The following is just a quick listing of some of the more common, or more unusual, things people have looked up that have brought them here.
I'm in a show that opens in November at a theatre here in town. Good times. The last time I was in a show I made a video I could post in different places to give people info on it. Figured I'd just keep that tradition alive...
****************************************
In other news: The job search continues and I'm still painfully under or over qualified for every job I'm finding. People keep saying how there aren't that many job openings out there, but that doesn't seem to be the case where I'm looking. The problem for me so far is just that the jobs are all a poor match for my skill set. Not that I'd particularly mind being overqualified for a position if it was something I could just relax and enjoy, but 1) I know I'd go bonkers after two days of bagging groceries, and 2) those jobs don't pay enough to cover my bills. :S
Where's a good sugar daddy when you need one?
I've got until mid-December to find work, at which point my unemployment insurance runs out and I'm up a particularly dense creek without adequate means of propulsion.
And now, a message to my politically minded friends (of which I have many) who keep sending me emails (by the terabyte) about the November elections:
I could really use some Easy Mac...Don't assume we're voting the same way when sending me politically themed emails, or that the praise you're forwarding for your candidate of choice sounds any less like the brainwashed silliness you complain about from "the other side." For every "My Party's Candidate Is A God Among Men!" link you send me that glows over your candidate of choice I have one that glows in an equally flashy and abrasive manner over mine while debunking everything your videos and links just plugged. Let's just leave it at "we're even" and assume nothing we say to each other will change the other's mind. Because let's face it: It won't.
If you're somewhere where you're unable to watch the video, here's what happens in it:
There's this meeting going on in Dallas someplace where you've got a bunch of guys sitting around a table talking about parking tickets coming in and then not being processed correctly and just... disappearing. One of the guys says the place they're going is like "a black hole" because of the way they all come in and then disappear like things do when they get sucked into a black hole.
All of a sudden two black members of the conversation start getting on that guy, some local white guy, saying that "black hole" is a racist term and demanding an apology and asking how he can say something so insulting at a table "with so much diversity represented" and blah blah blah. (Sorry, but where I come from, if you're going to say something racist then you're a jerk, no matter what all different groups are within earshot of your racist ass.)
The local news guy reporting the story talks with one of the two offended guys outside to ask him about his thoughts on the issue. The offended guy compares the white guy's use of "black hole" to his own hypothetical use of the phrase "Jew you down" and goes on to say they're equally inappropriate.
From Urban Dictionary: "jew you up: To totally f*** someone else up." and "Jew'd: also spelled "jewed", this slang term for being cheated or outdone in trade came from the stereotype of the Jewish people as shrewd bargainers and pennypinchers. Not recommended to use this term in front of a member of the religion, as they may be quite offended."
See how they're the same? A scientific term and an ethnic slur: Totally the same thing. Yup. Totally.
I was reading a blog the other day about a similar "town hall meeting" type situation where there was a group of folks discussing budgetary concerns and one of the people said he was tired of his opponent's "niggardly behavior" towards spending more money on area schools.
The opponent became outraged at this blatant use of what he thought was a racist epithet, especially in a public situation like this.
For goodness' sake, folks. Read a book.
****************************************
My dad is talking in very technical terms with his foreman, entirely in Spanish, in the other room. Sometimes I forget he can do that.
He just asked me how to say "shrink" in Spanish. *shrugs* I 'unno. The best I can come up with online is "encoger." Carlos buys that.
John Kenneth Galbraith
****************************************
Why isn't she allowed to say "the Muslim community was "destroying our country and imposing its acts"." Why must she pay thousands of euros for that?
I don't care what religion you're referring to; if you think its presence in your country is an entirely negative one, or perhaps only encourages certain negative things, you MUST say so, because few things in this world- organizations, ideologies, etc.- have such deeply seated, far reaching influence on mankind as his religious beliefs.
I mean-- look at this country. Look at all the awful nonsense that's been pulled since people first landed here, all in the name of the Christian church. I'm a Christian and I have a problem with people doing that, and with the particular things they're doing. And I expect people who aren't to have an even bigger problem with that.
They should speak up, and so should I.
And so should Brigitte Bardot.
************************************
Finding FARC
An important victory for Colombia sparks a major diplomatic spat.
By Aaron Mannes
...[W]hy is Chavez taking the lead in bashing Colombia?
There are several possibilities:
First, the hard drives captured from the FARC camp are absolute dynamite. So far the documents reveal that the FARC was negotiating with the Ecuadorian government at a very high level, that the FARC had given Chavez $150,000 while he was imprisoned after his 1992 coup attempt, and received $300 million from Chavez in return. ...
Second, Chavez is deterring possible Colombian attacks on FARC leaders in Venezuela. It has long been an open secret that the Venezuelan frontier regions were open territory to the FARC. ...
Third, Chavez is looking for an international crisis to distract the Venezuelans from their domestic crisis. This is the oldest play in the book for dictators the world over. ... Venezuela’s economy has been booming due to high oil prices, but there has been little trickle down. At the same time many of Chavez’s polices — particularly price controls on staples — have led to the predictable shortages and to popular discontent. ...
Fourth: Hugo es loco. There have been many rumors about Hugo’s mental health and some of his recent acts (such as calling for the exhumation of his hero Simon Bolivar’s remains for tests to see if he was assassinated by the oligarchs) are increasingly loopy. ...
... [A]s more intelligence about the FARC emerges from the late Raul Reyes’s hard drive, the nations of Latin America may be forced to make some tough decisions. Ecuador’s President Correa will have to decide if he wants to play Syria to Chavez’s Iran. But more broadly, the nations of Latin America, many of which have suffered from violence linked to the FARC, will have to decide if they can tolerate a state sponsor of terrorism in their midst or if that state should suffer the consequences of supporting terror.
- Nora Ephron
Well I'll be. Fidel Casto retired this morning.
And that's not a euphemism for "he died." He's still kickin'. His brother Raul's been bumped from "here, hold this a sec" to "here, have this" as the new dictator. We'll see where this goes.
From the article:
Ordinary Cubans have wondered whether a change in power in Cuba will lead to lower food prices, higher salaries and more freedom to travel.
In Miami, Florida, the news came as no surprise to Janisset Rivero, the executive director of Cuban Democratic Directorate, a group that works with dissidents in Cuba.
"I think there have been preparations taking place for quite a while to assure the crowning of Raúl Castro," she said Tuesday morning. "It doesn't mean any change to the system. It doesn't mean there will be freedom for the Cubans. One big dictator is replacing the other.
"It will be a big deal when political prisoners are released, when political parties are allowed to organize, when the country stops being ruled by a single party."
****************************************
Rocky rehearsal last night. Lines I've known since the first audition/read-thru were just totally gone. I'd open my mouth and NOTHING would come out. Hurried, frantic brain scan results: Nada. I started to freak out. I've got two more days to get this right. I was on a roll mem-wise and then yesterday? Bam! Gone! Freakin' out a little bit.
The worst will be to put in the time and the work and to enjoy it so much and to get all psyched about doing the show, and then to have no one show up because it's a new company and no one knows where it is.
We talked at the very beginning of the process about switching to a Thurs-Sat run and dropping Sunday all together, or pushing Sunday shows back to the evening, or doing two on Saturdays. We just didn't know what people might be more likely to come to since Sundays are historically ill-attended there. It's just not an area many theatre-goers *happen to be* on a Sunday afternoon at 4:30, you know?
It was 7 degrees last night when I pulled up to the theatre and there were these three or four older teens huddling in the doorway to Spiral to wait for their bus. They asked me what the space was for but before I could answer the door had been unlocked and I was being ushered in quickly to keep the open door from cooling the whole place off.
Our SM did have time to answer them when she arrived. She told them it was a "theatre company."
Their response?
"You guys build theatres in there??"
Hence: little to no passerby walk-in ticket purchases.
****************************************
It's currently 1 degree and sunny. High today of 12, wind chill of -10. I love it here. I really do. But sometimes I really do wonder how we survive this c-c-c-cold...
Spent an unfortunately large amount of my morning thinking things like: "Do I walk up close to the building or away from it? Sun warmth vs. wind break..." Ahhh errands in winter. Yum yum yum.
In spite of last night's crappy rehearsal (for me; Ryan, Sandra, and Josh were great!!!) I'm getting kinda sorta excitedish for Friday night. And Ben P. from high school may be attending the show at some point, which would be totally cool. :)
I just had half of a medium Coke from Subway. I feel like I just replace by esophagus with hollowed out, semi-flexible sugar cane. Ugh...
But if there is a storm, and you must be outside, you go outside and let the storm come.
You know you will get wet, but at least now you know that much.
*****************************
The heck?! Today's How-To on wikiHow: How To Get Pregnant
And here I thought the problem with America had to do in large part that far too many people don't know how not to get pregnant...
*****************************
Violations of 'Islamic teachings' take deadly toll on Iraqi women
The images in the Basra police file are nauseating: Page after page of women killed in brutal fashion -- some strangled to death, their faces disfigured; others beheaded. All bear signs of torture.
The women are killed, police say, because they failed to wear a headscarf or because they ignored other "rules" that secretive fundamentalist groups want to enforce.
"Fear, fear is always there," says 30-year-old Safana, an artist and university professor. "We don't know who to be afraid of. Maybe it's a friend or a student you teach. There is no break, no security. I don't know who to be afraid of."
Her fear is justified. Iraq's second-largest city, Basra, is a stronghold of conservative Shia groups. As many as 133 women were killed in Basra last year -- 79 for violation of "Islamic teachings" and 47 for so-called honor killings, according to IRIN, the news branch of the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. ...
"I think so far, we have been unable to tackle this problem properly," he says. "There are many motives for these crimes and parties involved in killing women, by strangling, beheading, chopping off their hands, legs, heads."
"When I came to Basra a year ago," he says, "two women were killed in front of their kids. Their blood was flowing in front of their kids, they were crying. Another woman was killed in front of her 6-year-old son, another in front of her 11-year-old child, and yet another who was pregnant." ...
Boldly splattered in red paint just outside the main downtown market, a chilling sign reads: "We warn against not wearing a headscarf and wearing makeup. Those who do not abide by this will be punished. God is our witness, we have notified you." ...
Click here to read the original NY Times article that SlashDot was referring to.
I hate to copy so much of an article, in part because you're just not s'pposed'ta, and in part because it looks annoying on the page. But because the NYT article may not be accessible for long, here it is:
An article about the Prophet Muhammad in the English-language Wikipedia has become the subject of an online protest in the last few weeks because of its representations of Muhammad, taken from medieval manuscripts. In addition to numerous e-mail messages sent to Wikipedia.org, an online petition cites a prohibition in Islam on images of people. The petition has more than 80,000 “signatures,” though many who submitted them to ThePetitionSite.com, remained anonymous.
“We have been noticing a lot more similar sounding, similar looking e-mails beginning mid-January,” said Jay Walsh, a spokesman for the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco, which administers the various online encyclopedias in more than 250 languages.
A Frequently Asked Questions page explains the site’s polite but firm refusal to remove the images: “Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with the goal of representing all topics from a neutral point of view, Wikipedia is not censored for the benefit of any particular group.”
The notes left on the petition site come from all over the world. “It’s totally unacceptable to print the Prophet’s picture,” Saadia Bukhari from Pakistan wrote in a message. “It shows insensitivity towards Muslim feelings and should be removed immediately.”
The site considered but rejected a compromise that would allow visitors to choose whether to view the page with images.
Paul M. Cobb, who teaches Islamic history at Notre Dame, said, “Islamic teaching has traditionally discouraged representation of humans, particularly Muhammad, but that doesn’t mean it’s nonexistent.” He added, “Some of the most beautiful images in Islamic art are manuscript images of Muhammad.”
The idea of imposing a ban on all depictions of people, particularly Muhammad, dates to the 20th century, he said. With the Wikipedia entry, he added, “what you are dealing with is not medieval illustrations, you are dealing with modern media and getting a modern response.”
It's not about respect, it's about control.
Google Image search for "Muhammad"
ETA: And speaking of control...
American Woman Jailed in Saudi Arabia for Sitting With Man at Starbucks
A 37-year-old American businesswoman and married mother of three is seeking justice after she was thrown in jail by Saudi Arabia's religious police for sitting with a male colleague at a Starbucks coffee shop in Riyadh, according to a report in The Times of London on Thursday.
Yara, who does not want her last name published for fear of retribution, was bruised and crying when she was freed from a day in prison after she was strip-searched, threatened and forced to sign false confessions by the Kingdom's "Mutaween" police, The Times reported.
"Some men came up to us with very long beards and white dresses. They asked 'Why are you here together?'. I explained about the power being out in our office. They got very angry and told me what I was doing was a great sin," recalled Yara, who wears an abaya and headscarf, like most Saudi women.
The men were from Saudi Arabia's Commission for Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, a police force of several thousand men charged with enforcing dress codes, sex segregation and the observance of prayers. ...
I was Stumbling last night and I came upon this neat link that had two little morality tales from 5 or 6 of the major world religions- Christianity, Judaism, Sikhism, Hinduism, Islam, and... something else? There's the wise man who meets the 6 blind men describing an elephant, the Indian prince who is given the throne by his step brother after his evil step mother who had him banished finally dies, the prodigal son, etc. It was kind of neat. (Ah-ha! Found it!)
The stories are told by a man whose narration is heard over *moving illustrations*-- think: "flannel board stories from Sunday school"-- with an open book as the background. It's all very simplistic, but some of the illustrations, which look like medieval illuminated texts, are quite beautiful. You get to see the pure men who follow the guru, the king of the monkeys, all that good stuff. Except for in the two stories from Islam.
In the two stories from Islam there are just... patterns. They're interesting patterns, and they shift and move, but after the illuminations from the other books it's like watching a screen saver program. Hardly the same effect.
I remember learning in high school about the Eastern Orthodox and Islamic churches and how they will use patterns in place of images of people or animals. But it was just so strange to see that play out in such a specific and random example.
And in totally unrelated news: Kirsten Dunst checks into rehab, and Amy Winehouse checks into finding something else to do this weekend.
Douglas Adams
It was -7 when I got to work today. 18 degree difference from yesterday morning when it was a whopping 11. But it's all in the sun and the wind and the moisture in the air, you know? I mean-- this morning felt just as *warm* as yesterday morning because yesterday morning was so windy, so dry...
My hands and patched with red and the whiteness of dry. I put lotion on them every couple of hours, and put on several layers of lotion when I get up and before going to bed. But it's not doing enough.
Still-- I'm enjoying the cold, enjoying the winter. I have scarves, I have leggings, I have coats, I have nasal spray. What's not to enjoy?
Today's Found: Letter to God (Gotta love that tacked on P.S.)
And now...
THE FOLLOWING ARE RIDAMNDICULOUS:
Three Pigs story ruled ‘offensive to Muslims’
The animated virtual book for primary school children, The Three Little Cowboy Builders, was also criticized for its potential to offend builders.
The row centered on the Bett awards, which were supported by Becta, the Government’s technology agency for schools. The judges’ remarks, reported on the education technology Web site Merlin John Online, included: “Is it true that all builders are cowboys, builders get their work blown down, and builders are like pigs?
“The idea of taking a traditional tale and retelling a story is fine, but it should not alienate parts of the workforce. Judges would not recommend this product to the Muslim community in particular.”
Nice work, England. Sounds like something straight out of Jim Garner's "Politically Correct Fairy Tales." But it's just a fictional book about piggies, England. It's just a story. Now you wanna see a group that's got offensiveness covered, you come on over to this side of the Atlantic. Let Amurica show ya' how it's done.
Kansas Baptist Church Intends to Picket Heath Ledger's Funeral Because He Played Gay Character
A radical Baptist church in Kansas known for picketing the funerals of soldiers who perished in Iraq said it intends to protest Heath Ledger's memorial service with signs claiming the actor died and is in Hell because he played a gay character in “Brokeback Mountain.” ...A hate group? No kidding, man.
Started 1955, the Topeka, Kan.-based church has conducted over 34,000 peaceful demonstrations opposing the homosexual lifestyle, according to their Web site, GodHatesFags.com.
The organization runs various Web sites, including GodHatesAmerica.com and others that condemn lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, Muslims, Roman Catholics and Jews as well as certain nationalities, according to Wikipedia. ...
The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies the church as a hate group and the organization is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League, according to its Wikipedia entry.
*sigh*
I think the only thing she got right was the part at the end of the article where she proclaimed "America is doomed."
And now for something a little sweeter, a little more touching, so hate ain't the last thing you read in this entry here today:
Director Spoke to Ledger Night Before His Death
Heath Ledger's director on the 2002 adventure movie Four Feathers, Indian filmmaker Shekhar Kapur, had plans to meet up with his former star – until tragic fate intervened.From CRG Residential's "Business Digest":
"I last spoke to him the night before he died. I had just arrived in New York last night, he said he could not see me that night but really wanted to meet me the next day," Kapur, 62, whose films also include the two Elizabeth movies starring Cate Blanchett... "He made me promise that I would call him in the morning and wake him up. I tried. Little did I know that his soul had already left his body."
... "In Heath I have lost a younger brother He was one the most gentle, the most honest, most caring and most compassionate persons I had met. And one of the most honest actors I worked with. ... Farewell Heath. I always knew you had an ancient soul. I always said you had a wisdom beyond your years. And somehow I always knew that your spirit was too restless. Goodbye, my brother."
From Kiplinger's Personal Finance
Of all the myths about our economy, none is more persistent- or wrong- than the "death of U.S. manufacturing." U.S. workers are producing and exporting record amounts, both in quantity and in dollar value, accounting for almost 25% of all goods produced globally. Despite the stunning rise of China and others, America's share of the world's total annual manufacturing has remained nearly level since 1982. Our homes may be filled with imported goods, but the big, expensive U.S.-made products that we don't purchase personally- plans, medical equipment and more- are the star exports of the global economy.
From Portfolio
In an arid corner of the Texas Panhandle, three giants- a legendary oilman and a pair of energy companies- have laid out land for two huge wind farms. Neither project has broken ground yet, but when completed they'll be the two biggest generators of wind electricity in the world. In the meantime, they need to lay lines that will one day deliver the power to more populated areas. The T. Boone Pickens project will cost an estimated $6.4 billion with a capacity of 4,000 megawatts, powering as many as 900,000 homes. The TXU-Shell partnership plans a capacity of 3,000 megawatts at a cost of $4.8 billion.
*Discuss.
*Please note the fine line of difference between "being an arrogant, self-righteous jerk," and "discussing"...
****************************************
RR is our Office Manager, a very sweet mother of two (three?).
RR: I'm going to put a poster board up that says: "Your mother doesn't work here. Clean up after yourself."
Me: Is it me? Is it the coffee counter? Did you just see me leave a mess when we were talking? Is that your passive aggressive way of telling me to get back in there and clean it up?
RR: *laughs* It's the shared bathroom. "Your mother doesn't work here. Clean up after yourself and put the seat down!" And anyway: I'm not passive aggressive. I'm just flat-out aggressive.
;)
****************************************
From Found Magazine:
The Seven Commandments of High School
Fat Camp
From TMZ.com:
Brad Renfro Dies
After The Show I joined
Crap- I think I'm developing a sty in my left eye. That or a zit. On the edge of my lower eye lid. Yeah- please explain to me how that one works okay?
Well well well,
Gore's prize: A fraud on the people
Alfred Nobel felt horrible about the uses to which his invention -- dynamite -- was put. So he endowed the Nobel Peace Prize and instructed that it go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."And to round things out, Australia's got a thing or two to say about it as well...
Al Gore has done exactly none of those things.
Gore, however, did write a book and make a film about global warming. He has become the second environmental activist to win the peace prize in the past four years. Wangari Muta Maathai won it in 2004 for planting trees.
Thus we have indisputable confirmation that the Nobel Peace Prize is no longer a serious international award. In 1994 the five Norwegian politicians who award the prize gave it to the murdering thug Yasser Arafat. Two years before that they gave it to literary fraud Rigoberta Menchu, whose autobiography was largely fabricated. (An example: The brother she supposedly watched die of malnutrition was later found by a New York Times reporter to be very much alive and well.)
On Friday the prize was given to Al Gore and the International Panel on Climate Change. Two days before, a British judge ruled that Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth," contained so many errors (read: lies) that it could be shown in British public schools only if accompanied by a fact sheet correcting the errors.
The Nobel Peace Prize is worse than a joke. It's a fraud.
Gore gets a cold shoulder
ONE of the world's foremost meteorologists has called the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize "ridiculous" and the product of "people who don't understand how the atmosphere works".
Dr William Gray, a pioneer in the science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, told a packed lecture hall at the University of North Carolina that humans were not responsible for the warming of the earth.
His comments came on the same day that the Nobel committee honoured Mr Gore for his work in support of the link between humans and global warming.
"We're brainwashing our children," said Dr Gray, 78, a long-time professor at Colorado State University. "They're going to the Gore movie [An Inconvenient Truth] and being fed all this. It's ridiculous." ...
... [H]e said, that same cycle meant a period of cooling would begin soon and last for several years.
"We'll look back on all of this in 10 or 15 years and realise how foolish it was," Dr Gray said. ...
He said his beliefs had made him an outsider in popular science.
"It bothers me that my fellow scientists are not speaking out against something they know is wrong," he said. "But they also know that they'd never get any grants if they spoke out. I don't care about grants."
On patrol with Iran's fashion police
It all starts with one simple sentence, spoken almost in a whisper, but which has a thunderous effect. A female police officer deployed in Tehran's latest moral crackdown tells a woman that her manto (overcoat) is too short and infringes Iranian Islamic dress rules."Azizam (my dear), good afternoon, if possible could we have a friendly chat, please allow us to have a small chat," the officer, a graduate of Tehran's police academy, tells the young woman. "My dear there is a problem with your manto. Please do not wear this kind of manto. Please wear a longer manto from now on."
Some are just let go there, but others are escorted to waiting minibuses with dark black tinted window panes and labelled "Guidance Patrol."
A girl in a short white manto whose long hair was tumbling out the front of her headscarf is taken by the police to one of the minibuses on Vanak Square in central Tehran -- an unexpected and unhappy end to her shopping trip. Another arrested woman is already inside the bus. She begins to cry. "I promise, I promise!"
And the minibus doors slam shut.
Tehran's police have said they are operating a three stage process in implementing the new wave of a crackdown on dress deemed to be unIslamic, which started with some intensity on Monday afternoon.
First, women are given a verbal warning on the street. If the problem is not resolved there, they are taken to the police station for "guidance" and to sign a vow not to repeat the offence. Should this be unsuccessful, their case is handed to the judiciary.
"Sure my manto is short, but there are many others whose clothes are more seductive than mine and they walking by without any punishment," one of the arrested girls in the minibus complained bitterly.
The arrested women will now go to a "centre for combating vice". Their parents will be phoned and they will bring a longer coat and fuller headscarf for their daughters. If the young women sign the pledge they will then be released.
"We want our words to have an effect on people," a female Iranian police officer, who by law was not allowed to give her name, told AFP before being dispatched to take part in the crackdown. "Our method is through guidance and via words. We do not face an instance that prompts us to be physical. We do not have any bats or sprays, in the toughest instances we may grab her hand and 'guide' her to the minibus," she said.
"I am doing this it as it is my duty and my job is supported by the religious teachings," another women clad in the black chador uniform of Tehran's female police added.
A girl confronted by the female police for having overly short trousers and transparent stockings apologizes.
"I am wearing stockings but, sorry, they are too light. Sorry I will change them, definitely I will change them. Now can I go?"
Not everything goes so smoothly.
One young passer-by rounds on the police for devoting such resources to moral crackdowns rather than other social problems as the minibus -- now filled with "badly veiled" women -- speeds away to the police station.
"Shame on you, look what you've done! The people's problem is not this, go fix your traffic situation, people are stuck in traffic for hours, go fix other real problems," she shrieks.
There was already considerable controversy inside Iran when the first stage of the "plan to increase security in society" was launched in April. Many conservatives have applauded the drive, but moderates have publicly questioned whether Iran would be better off tackling poverty and crime rather than slack dressing.
Just before the new crackdown started, popular television host Farzad Hasani grilled Tehran's police chief Ahmad Reza Radan about the drive on his talk show, accusing the police of "not differentiating between people and thugs."
An old woman in a black chador in Vanak Qquare echoed the sentiment. "Our youth have no peace of mind. They are afraid to go out, they are afraid that if they go out they will be taken to the police. Aren't they saying that there is freedom?"
This Islamic Dystopian reality is trying so desperately to take over there and it just-- it makes me sick. I mean-- you go into some conservative church over here- pick a religion, any religion- dressed a certain way and sure enough they'll probably want to kick you out. Might even do so. And if you pass those same people on the street they might leer at you or call you a sinner or unenlightened or whatever. But you know what? Sticks and stones, man. Want to be a jerk? Fine. You go your way, I'll go mine, and you can keep your lousy church to yourself and we'll both just keep on voting. But this? This government intervention to enforce the moral minutiae of a single religion at the cost of enforcing legitimate laws and by rounding up young women for showing their ankles or their bangs? I mean-- does this read as ridiculous to anyone else??
Douglas MacArthur
Are Hummers ridiculous? Yes.
Does anyone not on patrol in a war zone need one? No.
Have human beings since the beginning of human beings used their personal resources to attain ridiculous status symbols that served no real purpose and which items with lesser status and cost could be substituted just as easily and should we stop reacting with shock and violent retribution when it happens today in ways we aren't personally interested in? Yes.
It's the smugness (see article) that really burns me up. I'd rather deal with smog than smug. Eco self-righteousness is just as bad as any other kind. People hate religious self-righteousness ("We're so adamant and vocal because we honestly believe what we're telling you is true and that you must believe it to survive!"), political self-righteousness ("We're so adamant and vocal because blah blah survive!"), and anything else y'got. But shot-over-the-edge environmentalism seems to get a free pass. Not in all circles, not at all times, but you can't help but recognize that it's there an alarmingly high percentage of the time.
And you can't allow the reasoning it falls back on when all else is argued away.
- If the (fill in the blank Ultimate Supreme Being) is real, when you die you'll be glad you were a (fill in the blank religion). If they're not, no harm no foul.
- If the (fill in the blank be-whatever-about-everything political party) is right, when disaster strikes you'll be glad you were a (fill in the blank party). If they're not, oh well you just never can tell when it comes to disasters. *wink, nod*
- If the (extreme environmentalists) are right, seven generations from now your grandkids will be glad you... what? (Smashed up other people's cars to prove a point)? That's not what will have made things better for them.
And how much better do the people in this guy's neighborhood think it was for the environment when their cars were built? All those chemicals; all that metal being mined; the plastic, metal and rubber processing; all those fumes; all that waste. Gasoline is only one factor in a host of factors related to automobiles and their affects on the environment. And if the vandals who destroyed this guy's Hummer used a getaway vehicle of any kind I will snicker for at least four minutes.
Also: 14 mpg isn't unusual. People bitch about mileage with Hummers because they're so preposterously unnecessary as modes of transportation that they're easy targets, but 14 mpg is really pretty standard for other, smaller SUVs, for pick up trucks, many luxury sedans... And those aren't getting the flak Hummers get. I mean, some of these luxury BMW sedans (and coupes!) are coming in around 16 mpg-- we going to start smashing up parking lots down in Glenco now?!
I know it's not just the stats about Hummers that make them such a target; I know it's also what they symbolize to these people. But if the stats don't back up the symbol, then what's the damn hell point of elevating it as your Devil To Be Burned In Effigy?
(Author reserves the right to come back and edit when she's less peeved...)
In other news: New Zealanders Decry Ban on Political Satire
The vast majority of people in New Zealand are against a recent rule approved by lawmakers that bans using images captured inside Parliament to satirize, ridicule or denigrate lawmakers on broadcast and print media, according to a poll by TNS released by TV3. 71 per cent of respondents disapprove of this measure.Norwegian Irritation Grows Over High Taxes
In June, New Zealand’s House of Representatives voted to institute new media rules, which in effect ban the use of images in a way that satirizes, ridicules or denigrates lawmakers. Breaches of these measures can be treated as contempt of Parliament, a charge that can result in imprisonment.
by Nina Berglund
Norwegians have long accepted high taxes to finance their social welfare state, but a new survey indicates rising dissatisfaction and, in some cases, outright hatred of some taxes that are viewed as way too high and unfair.Sorry to toss that whole thing in there. I just don't really have time at this point to weed it for sound bites...Norwegians are among the most heavily taxed people in the world, and that in turn has made Norway one of the most expensive countries in which to live. Most accept the taxes they're ordered to pay on income and even net worth and property, but growing numbers are publicly complaining about sky-high taxes on everything from cars to fuel to consumer goods.
Norwegians differentiate between skatter (taxes) and avgifter (duties, fees or user taxes) and the latter is the most hated. They're what causes a glass of house wine at an Oslo restaurant to cost the equivalent of nearly USD 16, or a gallon of gas to cost nearly USD 9 at current exchange rates.
"It's clear that taxes are much too high in oil-rich Norway," Oslo resident Gro Pettersen told newspaper Aftenposten. "It's sick!"
The taxes placed on new cars, which can more than double the price of the car itself, are another bone of contention, even though most Norwegians support measures to protect the environment. "The car tax is much too high, but so are most all the other avgifter also," said Ernst Bendiksen of the northern city of Vadsø, where Norwegians are far more dependent on their cars than those living in cities with good public transit systems. "We certainly don't get anything in return for them."
The study also showed that 67 percent of the population think Norway's inheritance taxes are too high, while 63 percent think fuel taxes are too high. Norway's hefty 25 percent VAT (like a sales tax) on nearly all consumer items is considered too high by 53 percent of the population. Only 32 percent, meanwhile, believed tobacco taxes are too high, while 44 percent believed liquor taxes are too high.
A study conducted by research firm MMI for the Norwegian Tax Payers Association (Skattebetalerforeningen) showed that the most hated taxes are those on new cars and a transfer tax levied when real estate changes hands. The so-called dokumentavgift on real estate transactions, which implies that it's meant to cover the costs of property registration, costs homebuyers around 2.5 percent of the purchase price.
Three of four Norwegians believe that's too high, according to the MMI study, and absolutely no one believed it was too low. With even a modest flat in Oslo costing a few million kroner these days, the tax amounts to a fair bit of change.
Regressive inequality
The user taxes, or avgifter, are also unpopular because they're largely regressive taxes that hit people with low incomes much harder than those with high incomes. Filling the car's gas tank, and paying the taxes that requires, is much more expensive for someone earning NOK 300,000 than it is for a car owner earning NOK 900,000.
The head of the tax payers' association, Jon Stordrange, said he thinks user taxes should be adjusted to reflect actual costs inflicted on society. "Then I think people would have more respect for the system," he said.
And now, back to the daily grind with no hope in sight of anything to keep me from it. :P
But first- a quick diversion of headlines I caught this morning:
Chavez Warns of Resistance War with U.S.
...Dressed in olive green fatigues and a red beret, Chavez spoke inside Tiuna Fort—Venezuela's military nerve-center—before hundreds of uniformed soldiers standing alongside armored vehicles and tanks decorated with banners reading: "Fatherland, Socialism, or Death! We will triumph!"...Alright. So there we have Venezuela. And now, traveling down and over, a purse makes waves in Peru.
Under Chavez, Venezuela has recently purchased some $3 billion worth of arms from Russia, including 53 military helicopters, 100,000 Kalashnikov rifles, 24 SU-30 Sukhoi fighter jets.
Last week, Chavez said he is considering arms purchases, including submarines and a missile-equipped air defense system, as he prepares for a tour of Russia, Belarus and Iran.
"We are strengthening Venezuela's military power precisely to avoid imperial aggressions and assure peace, not to attack anybody," he said Sunday.
Actress Diaz apologizes for Mao bag
US actress Cameron Diaz has apologised for wearing a bag with a political slogan that evoked painful memories in Peru.
The voice of Princess Fiona in the animated Shrek films visited the Incan city of Machu Picchu in Peru's Andes wearing an olive green bag emblazoned with a red star and the words "Serve the People", perhaps Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong's most famous political slogan, printed in Chinese.
The bags are marketed as fashion accessories in some cities around the world, but in Peru the slogan evokes memories of the Maoist Shining Path insurgency that fought the government in the 1980s and early 1990s in a bloody conflict that left nearly 70,000 people dead.
"I sincerely apologise to anyone I may have inadvertently offended," Diaz said in a statement. "The bag was a purchase I made as a tourist in China and I did not realise the potentially hurtful nature of the slogan printed on it."
One prominent Peruvian human rights activist said Diaz should have been a little more aware of local sensitivities when picking her accessories.
So now-- when are people going to start speaking out against all the guilt-laden, white kids in those ridiculous Che Guevara shirts who assume that wearing the face of an arrogant murderer on their chests somehow absolves them? I mean- honestly...
Actually- no. I have to include a few Che links first before I close out this entry. Ooh that guy really burns me up.
"Che Chic; It's tres disgusting" by Jay Nordlinger
The fog of time and the strength of anti-anti-Communism have obscured the real Che. Who was he? He was an Argentinian revolutionary who served as Castro's primary thug. He was especially infamous for presiding over summary executions at La Cabana, the fortress that was his abattoir. He liked to administer the coup de grace, the bullet to the back of the neck. And he loved to parade people past El Paredon, the reddened wall against which so many innocents were killed. Furthermore, he established the labor-camp system in which countless citizens — dissidents, democrats, artists, homosexuals — would suffer and die. This is the Cuban gulag. A Cuban-American writer, Humberto Fontova, described Guevara as "a combination of Beria and Himmler." Anthony Daniels once quipped, "The difference between [Guevara] and Pol Pot was that [the former] never studied in Paris."
"The Killing Machine" by Alvaro Vargas Llosa
"How Che Murdered" by Pierre San Martin
And of course, the light-hearted, 'buy our t-shirts instead' link: "Who is Che Guevara?"
"Hatred as an element of the struggle; a relentless hatred of the enemy, impelling us above and beyond the natural limitations that man is heir to, and transforming him into an effective, violent, seductive and cold killing machine."
Che Guevara
Indeed.
***************************
Oh for goodness' sake, this is just too stinkin' funny:
"Germany bans Cruise film shoot" by Louis Charbonneau
Germany has barred the makers of a movie about a plot to kill Adolf Hitler from filming at German military sites because its star Tom Cruise is a Scientologist, the Defence Ministry said on Monday.Cruise, also one of the film's producers, is a member of the Church of Scientology which the German government does not recognize as a church. Berlin says it masquerades as a religion to make money, a charge Scientology leaders reject.
And on an oddly related (to the potential movie, that is) note: I wonder how Jolene feels about all this...
Iraqi TV says Saddam Hussein executed
By CHRISTOPHER TORCHIA and QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writers
4 minutes ago
BAGHDAD, Iraq - "Saddam Hussein, the shotgun-waving dictator who ruled
Iraq with a remorseless brutality for a quarter-century and was driven from power by a U.S.-led war that left his country in shambles, was taken to the gallows and executed Saturday, Iraqi state-run television reported.
...The execution came 56 days after a court convicted Saddam and sentenced him to death for his role in the killings of 148 Shiite Muslims from a town where assassins tried to kill the dictator in 1982. Iraq's highest court rejected Saddam's appeal Monday and ordered him executed within 30 days."
**************************
And because- for me, anyway- it's nearly impossible to know what one can possibly say to follow up an article on the execution of Saddam Hussein...
My Unitarian Jihad Name is: Sister Pepper Spray of Unassuming Acceptance. What's yours?
There. Isn't that better? *resumes actively ignoring the disintegration of society and the decay of the world at large*
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 11
What costume should Ruth start working on for Halloween?
Saffron (Firefly)![]()
![]()
4 (36.4%)
Charlie (Lost)![]()
![]()
1 (9.1%)
Lakshmi Singh (NPR)![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
Inga (Young Frankenstein)![]()
![]()
7 (63.6%)
Read into it what you will, or won't. Just thought this was interesting:
Chavez's Censorship -
Where 'Disrespect' Can Land You in Jail
By Jackson Diehl
Monday, March 28, 2005; Page A17
...[On March 18, 2005] Chavez handed [Venezuela's minister of communication and information Andres] Izarra a still-bigger stick: a new penal code that criminalizes virtually any expression to which the government objects -- not only in public but also in private.
Start with Article 147: "Anyone who offends with his words or in writing or in any other way disrespects the President of the Republic or whomever is fulfilling his duties will be punished with prison of 6 to 30 months if the offense is serious and half of that if it is light." That sanction, the code implies, applies to those who "disrespect" the president or his functionaries in private; "the term will be increased by a third if the offense is made publicly."
There's more: Article 444 says that comments that "expose another person to contempt or public hatred" can bring a prison sentence of one to three years; Article 297a says that someone who "causes public panic or anxiety" with inaccurate reports can receive five years. Prosecutors are authorized to track down allegedly criminal inaccuracies not only in newspapers and electronic media, but also in e-mail and telephone communications...
Fine fine- back to work. *sigh*
Another thing that really pisses me off about it: the people that are the keenest on taking care not to hurt anybody's feelings, on respecting Muslims' rights to want to kill us in the name of their religion and then doing everything in their power to make sure nothing stands in the way of that happening, are the same ones that somehow believe it's a "religion of peace" and that you can reason with fanatic fundamentalists in the heat of a holy war being faught in the name of preserving the honor of their god so that they will- what? Somehow suddenly change their minds and decide that maybe Allah really didn't tell them to slaughter us all?
Everybody gets so up in arms about figures like the Pope- that he stands for all that's wrong with the western world and represents all this old school church-rules-all-and-everyone business etc. etc. But what about the leaders in Islam? No need to have as large a figurehead as the Pope if every block has its own loudmouth pontificator and you're willing to die for him. And then if he goes down you'll die for the next guy just so long as he keeps calling for the end of you and me and our families and friends and coworkers and neighbors and teachers and artists...
Ruth Arnell is an infidel. Jane McCurley is an infidel. Jenny Kosek is an infidel. Caitlin Kukawski is an infidel. We are as much infidels as they Pope and George Bush and Jerry Falwell and Michael Moore and Barbara Streisand and that check-out lady at Food4Less with the blond hairs on her chin. It's about total eradication of all of us and the memory of our culture. And it won't stop until that's precisely what's achieved. But we let loud mouth know-it-alls who somehow don't believe Islam sincerely wants to kill us all to guilt us into not doing anything about the attack the entire western world is under right now because it's what we deserve, or because they're misunderstood, or some other such idiocy. It's the most ludicrous bullshit that can possibly be applied to such a situation-- but at least we won't have "[caused] moral damage... to Muslims' feelings." I hope that helps these folks sleep better at night.
( Read more... )
SO FRUSTRATED!!!
"At the heart of the protest: 12 caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad first published in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten in September and reprinted in European media in the past week. One depicted the prophet wearing a turban shaped as a bomb with a burning fuse. The paper said it had asked cartoonists to draw the pictures because the media was practicing self-censorship when it came to Muslim issues. The drawings have touched a raw nerve in part because Islamic law is interpreted to forbid any depictions of the Prophet Muhammad. Mahmoud Zahar, leader of the militant Palestinian group Hamas, told the Italian daily Il Giornale the cartoonists should be punished by death. "We should have killed all those who offend the Prophet and instead here we are, protesting peacefully." he said."
Peacefully? They burned down buildings!! That's peace?!?!
Laugh at me for feeling frustration at the sight of a "Jesus fish" turned into a joke for evolutionary theory. Watch my smile fade and listen to my voice grow silent as I become increasingly aware of my social irrelevance and the unwanted nature of what I hold dear. Ridicule and demean those with the guts to say "screw you I find the fish joke insulting." And when, in the name of a man ruled by the politics of his day, thousands of people become violent to the point of starting buildings on fire and demanding the death of twleve artists in repayment for twelve images, what will happen?
I defy the naive, shortsighted stupidity of such a sticker, and I mourn the violence we have to put up with in the polar opposite reality of the world beyond that sticker.
The only way "peace" can exist is-- is if Islam can succeed in having the Jews eliminated, and then the Christians, Hindus, Budhists, Wiccans, and then Science last of all because it won't see the end coming and will be oh so glad to help narrow down the list ahead of itself in the meantime!! *pant pant pant*
It's the inherent, unchageable nature of that particular system: destroy everyone who is not us, or else you're not one of us, and then you too must be destroyed. Isn't that sad? I mean, the Crusades, the Holocaust- at least they were politically motivated under the surface so new rule could stamp them out, and (after much horrificly criminal bloodshed) they were condemned and eventually ended. This... stuff- it only ends if the system promoting it falls away. Which it won't. And you can't condemn the ideology because that would leave no room for acceptance of diverse cultures of thought which, apparently, is worth more than peace, freedom, justice, life...
Coexist? Bloody unlikely.